The Biden Administration has confirmed it is sending advanced High Mobility Artillery Rocket Systems (HIMARS) to Ukraine. This most recent in a series of expansions in military assistance represents a significant shift in the sophistication of military hardware that the US has committed to leaders in Kyiv.
HIMARS will significantly extend the effective engagement range of Ukrainian forces, an important capability in the country’s vast eastern steppe. The system, which consists of a multi-launch rocket system mounted on a Medium Tactical Vehicle, fires a variety of rockets capable of satellite guidance with ranges of between 70- and 499-kilometers, though the Administration has stated it will only provide rounds with 70-kilometer approximate range. The promised transfer comes on the heels of the provision of other indirect fire weapons, including dozens of M77 Howitzers with a maximum range of 30 kilometers.
Russia’s decision to re-focus its military effort on seizing Ukraine’s eastern Donbas region has elevated the importance of long-range artillery systems in day-to-day fighting. In order to make up for strategic and tactical deficits, Moscow has leaned all the more heavily on its superior firepower to pound Ukrainian defenses and civilian targets from afar. Accordingly, Ukrainian officials have made increasingly desperate pleas for longer-range systems, like HIMARS, to counter Russia’s ability to bombard Ukrainian positions from beyond the reach of Ukrainian systems.
Until now, the Biden Administration had been hesitant to provide these long-range systems fearing the risk that it would be seen as a too great provocation to Moscow. But it seems that Russia’s advances in the Luhansk Oblast and its near capture of the city of Sievierodonetsk have altered calculations in Washington. The Biden Administration has sought to mitigate the risk of Russian retaliation, extracting commitments from the Ukrainians not to use the systems to strike targets in Russia and only providing medium range munitions.
The United States has only transferred the system to a handful of other partners. According to Lockheed Martin, the manufacturer of the system, the HIMARS is only currently fielded by the United States, Singapore, Jordan, Poland, Romania, and the United Arab Emirates, though data below from the Security Assistance Monitor also shows a 2020 sale of the system to Taiwan.
Recipient
Item Description
Year
Notification Value
Jordan
High Mobility Artillery Rocket Systems (HIMARS), Guided Multiple Launch Rocket System (GMLRS), Advanced Field Artillery Tactical Data System (AFATDS), Single Channel Ground and Airborne Radio Systems
2009
$220,000,000
Qatar
High Mobility Artillery Rocket Systems (HIMARS), Army Tactical Missile System (ATACMS), and Guided Multiple Launch Rocket System (GMLRS)
2012
$406,000,000
United Arab Emirates
High Mobility Artillery Rocket Systems (HIMARS) Launchers
2014
$900,000,000
Romania
High Mobility Artillery Rocket Systems (HIMARS) and Related Support and Equipment
2017
$1,250,000,000
Poland
High Mobility Artillery Rocket System (HIMARS)
2017
$250,000,000
Poland
High Mobility Artillery Rocket System (HIMARS) and Related Support and Equipment
2018
$655,000,000
Taiwan
High Mobility Artillery Rocket Systems (HIMARS) M142 Launchers and related equipment – TECRO
2020
$436,100,000
Foreign Military Sales Notifications for HIMARS (Courtesy of the Security Assistance Monitor)
While the decision to transfer the HIMARS may set significant precedent, it is likely too late for the weapons system to turn the tide in the Luhansk Oblast. There Russian forces are on the verge of capturing Sievierodonetsk—at this point the easternmost city controlled by Kyiv—which will give Russia control of the entire province. Moreover, the Administration has thus far only committed to sending four of the systems, a figure some Ukrainian officials have said is insufficient to make a difference on the battlefield.
But Russia’s concentration of forces around in the east has left other parts of the front vulnerable to Ukrainian counterattacks, including Kherson, the only place in Ukraine where Russia managed to hold significant territory on the west bank of the Dnipro River. Additionally, Ukraine’s ability to maintain its positions in the Donetsk Oblast just to the southwest of Luhansk may be bolstered by the arrival of these new weapons, especially if these transfers are indicative of future assistance to come.
Home to more than 100 scholars and global affiliates, the Stimson Center is proud to be a magnet for the world’s leading experts on the most pressing foreign policy and national security issues of our time. Explore our experts and their work.
Conventional Arms
Share:
The Biden Administration has confirmed it is sending advanced High Mobility Artillery Rocket Systems (HIMARS) to Ukraine. This most recent in a series of expansions in military assistance represents a significant shift in the sophistication of military hardware that the US has committed to leaders in Kyiv.
HIMARS will significantly extend the effective engagement range of Ukrainian forces, an important capability in the country’s vast eastern steppe. The system, which consists of a multi-launch rocket system mounted on a Medium Tactical Vehicle, fires a variety of rockets capable of satellite guidance with ranges of between 70- and 499-kilometers, though the Administration has stated it will only provide rounds with 70-kilometer approximate range. The promised transfer comes on the heels of the provision of other indirect fire weapons, including dozens of M77 Howitzers with a maximum range of 30 kilometers.
Russia’s decision to re-focus its military effort on seizing Ukraine’s eastern Donbas region has elevated the importance of long-range artillery systems in day-to-day fighting. In order to make up for strategic and tactical deficits, Moscow has leaned all the more heavily on its superior firepower to pound Ukrainian defenses and civilian targets from afar. Accordingly, Ukrainian officials have made increasingly desperate pleas for longer-range systems, like HIMARS, to counter Russia’s ability to bombard Ukrainian positions from beyond the reach of Ukrainian systems.
Until now, the Biden Administration had been hesitant to provide these long-range systems fearing the risk that it would be seen as a too great provocation to Moscow. But it seems that Russia’s advances in the Luhansk Oblast and its near capture of the city of Sievierodonetsk have altered calculations in Washington. The Biden Administration has sought to mitigate the risk of Russian retaliation, extracting commitments from the Ukrainians not to use the systems to strike targets in Russia and only providing medium range munitions.
The United States has only transferred the system to a handful of other partners. According to Lockheed Martin, the manufacturer of the system, the HIMARS is only currently fielded by the United States, Singapore, Jordan, Poland, Romania, and the United Arab Emirates, though data below from the Security Assistance Monitor also shows a 2020 sale of the system to Taiwan.
While the decision to transfer the HIMARS may set significant precedent, it is likely too late for the weapons system to turn the tide in the Luhansk Oblast. There Russian forces are on the verge of capturing Sievierodonetsk—at this point the easternmost city controlled by Kyiv—which will give Russia control of the entire province. Moreover, the Administration has thus far only committed to sending four of the systems, a figure some Ukrainian officials have said is insufficient to make a difference on the battlefield.
But Russia’s concentration of forces around in the east has left other parts of the front vulnerable to Ukrainian counterattacks, including Kherson, the only place in Ukraine where Russia managed to hold significant territory on the west bank of the Dnipro River. Additionally, Ukraine’s ability to maintain its positions in the Donetsk Oblast just to the southwest of Luhansk may be bolstered by the arrival of these new weapons, especially if these transfers are indicative of future assistance to come.
Recent & Related
The EU’s Technocratic Trap in Libya: How Brussels Is Ceding the Mediterranean
The Sovereignty Paradox: Why GCC Security Integration Remains Elusive
Japan’s Tentative Entry Into a Shifting Global Arms Market
The Time is Ripe for Next Steps on US-Japan Military Shipbuilding Cooperation
Israel Cannot Achieve Normalization with Lebanon by Bombing It
Sudan: How One of the Most Severe Humanitarian Crises Became Marginalized in the Global System
Beneath the Strait: Iran Could Threaten Gulf Data Centers, Undersea Cables
Mali’s Post-Alignment Strategy: Sovereignty, Partnerships, and the Limits of Stabilization
Turkey Also Tries to Mediate an End to the US-Israeli War on Iran
The Motives and Constraints Behind Pakistan’s Mediation Between the US and Iran
The Impact of US-Sponsored Ukraine-Russia Talks on Moldova’s Security
Smuggling Sovereignty: What Arkenu Reveals About Libya’s Fragmented Oil State
การทำเหมืองแร่โดยไม่ได้รับการควบคุมตามแนวแม่น้ำในแผ่นดินใหญ่ของเอเชียตะวันออกเฉียงใต้
ການຂຸດຄົ້ນ-ປຸງແຕ່ງແຮ່ທີ່ບໍ່ຖືກຕ້ອງ ຢູ່ຕາມແມ່ນໍ້າສາຍຕ່າງໆ ຢູ່ແຜ່ນດິນໃຫຍ່ອາຊີຕາເວັນອອກສຽງໃຕ້ Unregulated Mining Along Rivers in Mainland Southeast Asia (Lao Language)
Current Geopolitics Shift Deep-Sea Mining Debates
Navigating Seabed Mining in the Cook Islands: A Conversation with John Parianos
การทำเหมืองแร่โดยไม่ได้รับการควบคุมตามแนวแม่น้ำในแผ่นดินใหญ่ของเอเชียตะวันออกเฉียงใต้
Mining in Mainland Southeast Asia – River Basins Dashboard
Unregulated Mining Along Rivers in Mainland Southeast Asia
Trump’s Critical Minerals Search in Africa Won’t Tip the Scales Against China
North Korea’s Integration of AI Across Cyber, Economic, and Military Domains
AI in the Age of Fake (Imagined) Content
Find an Expert
Home to more than 100 scholars and global affiliates, the Stimson Center is proud to be a magnet for the world’s leading experts on the most pressing foreign policy and national security issues of our time. Explore our experts and their work.